It seemed to me that, leading up to the worldwide economic recession, climate change was building up to a critical mass of public exposure and concern. A large and increasing quantity of airtime and newspaper coverage was helping propel this topic into the mainstream of public attention. Perhaps, when the good times were rolling, we had the luxury of caring about things above and beyond the basic human needs of providing food and shelter for our families. It has been proven empirically that as a Nations Gross Domestic Product increases past a certain point, so too does a desire to live in a clean and unpolluted environment (see Environmental Kuznets Curve).
Since 2008, with the recession in full swing, the debate regarding Climate Change took a back seat to “more important”(read more short term) fundamental issues. Public concern about the environment fell off dramatically leading to lower levels of media and political attention. Politicians in developed nations were all for installing ambitious targets and legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions when the times were good and capital was plentiful. Now that Sovereign Debt is a major issue in most Western economies, politicians are being asked to quickly reduce their nation’s budget deficits leading to some tough decisions that are needed. In the UK, some departments are facing 40% funding decreases and are being asked to do more with less. Added to this, the developed economies have not nearly recovered as fast as those in emerging markets leading to a very weak and fragile recovery. Asking companies to invest more money into cleaner technologies and reduce their carbon footprints may have seemed like a good idea before the recession but now are being perceived as potential recovery busters. The last thing the UK Government will want to do is damage the economy’s chances of a speedy recovery so some of these potential climate change orientated measures are coming under greater scrutiny.